Problemas Teoremas

Setembro 12, 2010

Problema do mês :: Problem of the month #6

pdmpom20100913

Enunciado do Problema

Os quatro círculos têm o mesmo raio. Determine-o no caso do triângulo medir 1 m².

  • Serão bem-vindas soluções até ao fim do mês, comentando ou por email: acltavares@sapo.pt

Problem Statement

The four circles have equal radius. Find it if the size of the triangle is 1 m².

  • Solutions till the end of the month will be welcome, in the comments
    box or via e-mail:
    acltavares@sapo.pt

Setembro 8, 2010

Série de termo geral n²/xⁿ :: Series of general term n²/xⁿ

Demostre que para x>1, x\in\mathbb{R} a função f(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\dfrac{n^{2}}{x^{n}} é convergente e determine, justificando, a sua expressão analítica, na forma de fracção racional f(x)=\dfrac{P(x)}{Q(x)}.

Sugestão: utilize a série geométrica de razão x e 1.º termo 1, diferencie e multiplique por x duas vezes.

Prove that for x>1, x\in\mathbb{R} the function f(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\dfrac{n^{2}}{x^{n}} converges and find, with proof, its analytical expression in the form of a rational function f(x)=\dfrac{P(x)}{Q(x)}.

Hint: use the geometrical series with ratio x and first term 1, differentiate and multiply by x twice.

Março 29, 2010

Problema do mês :: Problem of the month #4. (Integral impróprio :: Improper integral). Resolução :: Solution

ver/see Problema do mês Problem of the month

\bigskip

Problema

Prove ou infirme: \pi =\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{\cos x-\cos 3x}{x^{2}}dx

Solução de Prof. Paulo Sérgio

Para calcular esta integral, note que

\dfrac{1}{s^{2}}=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }xe^{-sx}dx

Assim,

I:=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{\cos \left( s\right) -\cos \left( 3s\right) }{s^{2}}ds

=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\int_{0}^{\infty }xe^{-sx}\left[ \cos \left( s\right) -\cos \left( 3s\right) \right] dxds

Invertendo a ordem de integração e usando a definição de transformada de Laplace, temos:

I=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }x\int_{0}^{\infty }\left[ \mathcal{L}\left\{ \cos\left( s\right) \right\} -\mathcal{L}\left\{ \cos \left( 3s\right) \right\}\right] dx

=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\left( \dfrac{x^{2}}{1+x^{2}}-\dfrac{x^{2}}{9+x^{2}}\right) dx

ou seja,

I=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{9}{9+x^{2}}dx-\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{dx}{1+x^{2}}=\left[ 3\arctan \left( \dfrac{x}{3}\right) -\arctan \left( x\right) \right] _{0}^{\infty }

=\dfrac{3\pi }{2}-\dfrac{\pi }{2}=\dfrac{2\pi }{2}=\pi .

Outra resolução: fatima

* * *

Problem

Prove or disprove: \pi =\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{\cos x-\cos 3x}{x^{2}}dx.

 

Solution by Prof. Paulo Sérgio

To evaluate this integral note that

\dfrac{1}{s^{2}}=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }xe^{-sx}dx

Hence,

I:=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{\cos \left( s\right) -\cos \left( 3s\right) }{s^{2}}ds

=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\int_{0}^{\infty }xe^{-sx}\left[ \cos \left( s\right) -\cos \left( 3s\right) \right] dxds

By reversing the order of integration and using the definition of the Laplace transform we get:

I=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }x\int_{0}^{\infty }\left[ \mathcal{L}\left\{ \cos\left( s\right) \right\} -\mathcal{L}\left\{ \cos \left( 3s\right) \right\}\right] dx

=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\left( \dfrac{x^{2}}{1+x^{2}}-\dfrac{x^{2}}{9+x^{2}}\right) dx

therefore,

I=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{9}{9+x^{2}}dx-\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{dx}{1+x^{2}}=\left[ 3\arctan \left( \dfrac{x}{3}\right) -\arctan \left( x\right) \right] _{0}^{\infty }

=\dfrac{3\pi }{2}-\dfrac{\pi }{2}=\dfrac{2\pi }{2}=\pi .

Other Solver: fatima

Fevereiro 25, 2010

Problema sobre a convergência de um integral impróprio :: An Improper Integral Convergence Problem

Demonstre ou infirme: o integral / Prove or disprove: the integral

\displaystyle{\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{1}{e^{x}\left( 1-e^{-x}\right) ^{2}}dx}

é convergente / converges.

25.05.10: corrigida a função integranda /integrand function corrected. Deve ser/Should be 

\dfrac{1}{e^{x}\left( 1-e^{-x}\right)^{2}}

 em vez de/instead of 

\dfrac{1}{e^{2x}\left( 1-e^{-x}\right)^{2}}

Resolução/Solution: O integral é divergente/The integral diverges:

\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{e^{-x}}{\left( 1-e^{-x}\right) ^{2}}dx=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty }\dfrac{d}{dx}\left( \dfrac{1}{e^{-x}-1}\right) dx

=\underset{x\rightarrow \infty }{\lim }\ \dfrac{1}{e^{-x}-1}-\underset{x\rightarrow 0}{\lim }\ \dfrac{1}{e^{-x}-1}=-1-(-\infty) =\infty

Janeiro 1, 2010

1.º Problema de 2010: um integral de Stieltjes :: 2010 Problem #1 – A Stieltjes Integral

Prove que/prove that

\zeta \left( 2\right) =\dfrac{p}{q}\displaystyle\int_{-1}^{\sqrt{3}}\arctan (x)\,d\left( \arctan (x)\right) ,

where/em que  (p,q)\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}.

Dezembro 5, 2009

My Solution of The Purdue University Problem Of The Week No. 12

Filed under: Calculus,Cálculo,Matemática,Math,Problem,Problemas,Purdue University — Américo Tavares @ 7:56 am
Tags: ,

My solution of POW12 was accepted. [Remark of December 19, 2009: it is only stated that it was "completely or partially proved"]

(Tradução aqui)

Problem. Find, with proof, the maximum value of \displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{k}x_{j} where x_{j}\geq 0,\displaystyle\sum\limits_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}=100, and k is variable. In particular, your answer must be greater than or equal to all values obtained from other choices of k.

Here is the solution I submited.

Solution.

Let \left( x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{k}\right) \in\mathbb{R}^{k}, f\left( x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{k}\right) =\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}\in\mathbb{R}, c\left( x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{k}\right) =\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}-100 \in\mathbb{R} and \lambda\in\mathbb{R}. For a given k\in\mathbb{Z}, with k\geq 1, we know by the Lagrange multipliers method that f\left( x_{1}^{\ast },x_{2}^{\ast },\ldots ,x_{k}^{\ast }\right) is a local extremum if for x^{\ast }=\left( x_{1}^{\ast },x_{2}^{\ast },\ldots,x_{k}^{\ast }\right)

\nabla f\left( x^{\ast }\right) -\nabla c\left( x^{\ast }\right) \lambda^{\ast }=0\quad \quad k\text{ equations}

c\left( x^{\ast }\right) =0\quad \quad 1\text{ equation}

where \lambda ^{\ast } is the value of the multiplier \lambda that is a solution of these k+1 equations. Hence we have respectively

\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j\neq i}^{k}x_{j}^{\ast }-\lambda ^{\ast }=0\quad\quad 1\leq i\leq k

and

\displaystyle\sum\limits_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}^{\ast}-100=0\text{. }

Solving this system of equations we find

x_{1}^{\ast }=x_{2}^{\ast }=\cdots =x_{i}^{\ast }\cdots =x_{k}^{\ast}=\lambda ^{\ast }=\dfrac{100}{k}

and

\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}^{\ast}=\left( \dfrac{100}{k}\right) ^{k},

the latter being a local extremum of f\left( x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{k}\right) , for a fixed k. We transformed the initial maximizing problem in k continuous variables and the discrete variable k into the maximizing of \left( 100/k\right) ^{k}. Now we introduce the following function

u\left( t\right) =\left( \dfrac{100}{t}\right) ^{t}\quad\text{with }t\in\mathbb{R}\text{.}

The function u\left( t\right) has a maximum at the same point t than the function

v\left( t\right) =\ln u\left( t\right) =t\ln 100-t\ln t\text{.}

On the other hand v^{\prime }\left( t\right) =0 for t^{\ast }=e^{\ln100-1}\simeq 36.788,v^{\prime }\left( t\right) >0 for t<t^{\ast } and v^{\prime }\left( t\right) <0 for t>t^{\ast }. Therefore

u\left( t^{\ast }\right) =\left( \dfrac{100}{t^{\ast }}\right) ^{t^{\ast }}

is a maximum of u\left( t\right) . Since u\left( 37\right) >u\left( 36\right) , the maximum occurs at k=37. Thus, for \sum_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}=\sum_{j=1}^{37}x_{j}=100 we have

\max\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}=\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{37}x_{j}=\left( \dfrac{100}{37}\right) ^{37}\text{.}

Update (Dec., 19,2009): some errors (identified by Rod Carvalho here) corrected.

Agosto 26, 2009

Three gamma function identities

Let n=1,2,\ldots  . Show that

\sqrt{\pi}\;\Gamma (2n+1)=2^{2n}\Gamma\left( n+\dfrac{1}{2}\right) \Gamma (n+1)\qquad\left( 1\right)

and

\sqrt{\pi}\;\Gamma (2n)=2^{2n-1}\Gamma (n)\Gamma\left( n+\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\qquad \left( 2\right) .

Let x\in\mathbb{R}. If x>0, show that

\sqrt{\pi}\;\Gamma (2x)=2^{2x-1}\Gamma (x)\Gamma\left( x+\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\qquad \left( 3\right) .

Hints: for the first two identities use the formula proved here. As for the last one evaluate the beta function value B(x,x) and by means of an appropriate  change of variable find a relation between B(x,x) and B\left(x,\dfrac{1}{2}\right) .

PS. Listed in the Carnival of Mathematics #56. See pingback in the 1st comment.

Julho 24, 2008

Problem of the Week #2 [from Walking Randomly blog] – Submission

I’ve just submitted the following solution for the

« Integral of the Week #2

The second Integral Of The Week (IOTW) is rather different from the first in that I am going to give you the evaluation. Your task is to prove it.

\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2}\; dx=\sqrt{\pi}

But WAIT! Almost every time I have seen this integral evaluated, it has been done by squaring it and converting to polar co-ordinates and that’s the one method of evaluation you can’t use for this particular challenge. I am looking for more ‘interesting’ proofs. Have fun.

Solutions can be posted in the comments section or sent to me by email (obtaining my email address is another puzzle for you to solve) and will be discussed in a future post. Feel free to send your solution in just about any format you like – plain text, uncompiled Latex, PDF, postscript, Mathematica, ODF, even Microsoft Word. When I get around to posting the solutions I will attempt to standardize them (to PDF probably).

By the way – you still have time to submit a solution for the first IOTW.

http://calcauxprobteor.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/integral-of-the-week-2-walking-randomly/]

[updated at 22:30 GMT: two typos in integrals corrected and explanation improved]

[update of July 26, 2008: \square added]

- : – : – leia o resto »

Tema: Rubric. Blog em WordPress.com.